[Prism54-users] Netgear WG311 Installation

Luis R. Rodriguez mcgrof@ruslug.rutgers.edu
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:47:39 -0500 (EST)


Have you tried the atheros driver? The Netgear WG311 might just be
an atheros chipset device.

	Luis
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, m0bius wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: prism54-users-admin@prism54.org [mailto:prism54-users-
> > admin@prism54.org] On Behalf Of Luis R. Rodriguez
> > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 7:08 PM
> > To: m0bius
> > Cc: prism54-users@prism54.org
> > Subject: RE: [Prism54-users] Netgear WG311 Installation
> >
> >
> > > 00:0d.0 Class 0200: 168c:0013 (rev 01)
> > >         Subsystem: 1385:4900
> >
> > This guy is not in our suported cards and if you read it was Atheros then
> > it probably was. If you want to try if your card would work with our
> > driver you can apply the patch:
> >
> > wget http://prism54.org/~mcgrof/patch-netgearWG311.diff
> > cd prism54-cvs-latest
> > patch -p1 < ../patch-netgearWG311.diff
> >
> > If you can't get the patch to work read the patch with an editor, it
> > should give you an idea what to do.
> >
> > 	Luis
>
> Ok this is even weirder...
>
> I've applied the patch and the results:
>
> kernel: Loaded prism54 driver, version 1.0.2.2
> kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 2 for device 0000:00:0d.0
> kernel: IRQ routing conflict for 0000:00:0d.0, have irq 9, want irq 2
>
> And while doing the modprobe:
>
> modprobe prism54
> Segmentation Fault. <- ???
>
> Is this a simple conflict solved by the bios or is the driver requests
> specific IRQ address?
>
> Paris
>
>