[Prism54-users] Re: [OFF-TOPIC] The SPAM

[Bill Maidment]

I second that vote for Spamassassin/Bayes but I would also add ClamAV, 
File-Scan, Razor2 and SPFilter. The more checks the better. My system 
uses all these through the Sendmail/Milter and is known to be highly 
scaleable.

Just my 2 cents worth.
Bill


Karl-Heinz Herrmann wrote:

>On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:36:20 -0800 (PST)
>Bradley Chapman <kakadu_croc@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>*sigh*
>>
>>A virus ended up in my Inbox from this mailinglist, and out of 19
>>messages at least 2/3 were spam. Are there still issues with the spam
>>filters?
>>    
>>
>
>I've spamassassin running locally with a trained Bayes filter and
>receive just about zero SPAM. on false positive I can not comment right
>now. So whatever filter is used on the mailinglist a switch to some
>filter with analysis rules in connection with bayes filtering seems to
>be pretty effective. spamassassin offers a spamd which speeds up
>processing of larger numbers of mails, its quite useable with procmail
>scripts. The actual discarding is done by procmail according to
>spamassassins results. So this should integrate well in mailinglist
>processing.
>
>Just an idea....
>
>
>K.-H.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Prism54-users mailing list
>Prism54-users@prism54.org
>http://prism54.org/mailman/listinfo/prism54-users
>
>  
>