[Prism54-devel] [patch 0/6] [prism54 svn trunk] various fixes for prism54 svn

Maximilian Engelhardt maxi at daemonizer.de
Mon May 16 21:39:32 UTC 2005


On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 17:03 -0400, Bob Beers wrote:
> On 5/16/05, Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi at daemonizer.de> wrote:
> 
> > You can downloading daily svn snapshots at
> > http://prism54.org/pub/linux/snapshot/tars/
> > 
> > simply download the latest version and apply the patches.
> > 
> > Maxi
> 
> Thanks, Maxi!  I knew they were there somewhere.
> 
> Unfortunately, the patches won't apply (for me) to today's
>  snapshot.  Patches 1-4 I could apply by hand.  But patch 5
>  really has me stumped.  I didn't try patch 6 since you
>  said to apply them in order.  Which snapshot did you create
>  the patches against?  How did you create those patch
>  files?  I like:
> 
>  bash# patch -burpN orig/ current/ > description.patch
> 
> For example here's a version of JB's first patch which _does_ apply
> for me to unaltered source, prism54-svn=20050516:
> 
> <code>
> diff -burpN prism54-svn=20050516-orig/ksrc/islpci_mgt.c
> prism54-svn=20050516/ksrc/islpci_mgt.c
> --- prism54-svn=20050516-orig/ksrc/islpci_mgt.c	2005-03-09
> 20:38:25.000000000 -0500
> +++ prism54-svn=20050516/ksrc/islpci_mgt.c	2005-05-16 14:03:04.000000000 -0400
> @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ islpci_mgmt_rx_fill(struct net_device *n
>  		isl38xx_fragment *frag = &cb->rx_data_mgmt[index];
>  
>  		if (buf->skb == NULL) {
> -			buf->skb = alloc_skb(MGMT_FRAME_SIZE+2, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +		        buf->skb = dev_alloc_skb(MGMT_FRAME_SIZE+2);
> +		        /* fixme : should do some realignment work */
>  			if (!buf->skb) {
>  				printk(KERN_WARNING
>  				       "Error allocating management frame.\n");
> @@ -136,9 +137,10 @@ islpci_mgmt_rx_fill(struct net_device *n
>  			}
>  			buf->size = MGMT_FRAME_SIZE;
>  			buf->mem = buf->skb->data;
> +			buf->pci_addr = 0;
>  		}
>  		if (buf->pci_addr == 0) {
> -			buf->pci_addr = pci_map_single(priv->pdev, buf->skb,
> +			buf->pci_addr = pci_map_single(priv->pdev, buf->skb->data,
>  						       MGMT_FRAME_SIZE,
>  						       PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
>  			if (!buf->pci_addr) {
> @@ -345,11 +347,13 @@ islpci_mgt_receive(struct net_device *nd
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Ensure the results of device DMA are visible to the CPU. */
> +                /* frag_len not being the whole buffer, we need to
> +                 * synchronize the whole buffer */
>  		pci_dma_sync_single(priv->pdev, buf->pci_addr,
> -				frag_len, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> +				MGMT_FRAME_SIZE, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
>  
>  		/* Perform endianess conversion for PIMFOR header in-place. */
> -		header = pimfor_decode_header(buf->skb, frag_len);
> +		header = pimfor_decode_header(buf->skb->data, frag_len);
>  		if (!header) {
>  			printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: no PIMFOR header found\n",
>  			       ndev->name);
> </code>
> (The only difference being the numbers in the hunk headers.)
> 
> 
> output of issuing the patch command is:
> bbeers at alakazam:~/download/prism54/prism54-svn=20050516/ksrc$ patch
> -p2 --verbose < ../../bb-jbn1.patch
> Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |diff -burpN prism54-svn=20050516-orig/ksrc/islpci_mgt.c
> prism54-svn=20050516/ksrc/islpci_mgt.c
> |--- prism54-svn=20050516-orig/ksrc/islpci_mgt.c        2005-03-09
> 20:38:25.000000000 -0500
> |+++ prism54-svn=20050516/ksrc/islpci_mgt.c     2005-05-16
> 14:03:04.000000000 -0400
> --------------------------
> Patching file islpci_mgt.c using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 128.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 137.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 347.
> done
> 
> For now I'll try the latest snapshot and report any progress,
>  then I'll try to apply JB's patches to an older snapshot if
>  you think it is worthwhile.

What I did here:

wget
http://prism54.org/pub/linux/snapshot/tars/2005-05/prism54-svn=20050516.tar.bz2
tar -xjf prism54-svn\=20050516.tar.bz2
cd prism54-svn\=20050516
patch -p1 < path_to_first_patch
patch -p1 < path_to_second_patch
....
make modules
make install

while patching you shouldn't see any hunks.
If it doesn't work for you I can also put a patched version online.

Maxi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://prism54.org/pipermail/prism54-devel/attachments/20050516/ed5b8689/attachment.pgp


More information about the Prism54-devel mailing list