[Prism54-devel] Re: [RFC] acx100 inclusion in mainline;
generic 802.11 stack
Luis R. Rodriguez
mcgrof at ruslug.rutgers.edu
Tue Sep 28 12:20:28 UTC 2004
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 01:52:00PM -0700, greg chesson wrote:
>
>
> Vladimir Kondratiev wrote:
> >Greg,
> >you missed one important point. Besides data packets, that every driver
> >now convert .11<->.3 using almost the same code, there is whole story of
> >management. Many modern cards are "softmac" and do all management on host.
> >I see no point for every driver to implement its own scanning and
> >association.
>
> Yes, Quite right. No disagreement.
> It is standard practice on NDIS and Apple Darwin that a common GUI-based
> application controls scanning, association, and manages
> keys+authentication+crypto.
>
> Linux does the same thing (driver is configured by application code)
> although there does not yet exist a single app
> that can serve as a common point of control for multiple vendor drivers.
> I believe that achieving that goal is the real payoff for wireless Linux
> users.
>
<-- snip -->
RFC: what are the chances we can implement our own generic "softmac" that may
be usable by the different chipsets out there?
Luis
--
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mcgrof.com/pipermail/prism54-devel/attachments/20040928/959f4204/attachment.pgp
More information about the Prism54-devel
mailing list