[Prism54-devel] [Bug 92] Can't get on a not announced essid when
the access point also announces a other essid
bugzilla-daemon at mcgrof.com
bugzilla-daemon at mcgrof.com
Wed Jul 28 11:51:46 UTC 2004
http://prism54.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92
------- Additional Comments From margitsw at t-online.de 2004-07-28 11:51 -------
To get up to date, here is E-Mail ro Robbert/Stefan :
Well, unfortunately I can't reproduce this.
Two AP's , Open SSID on Chan 6, Hidden on chan 11.
Config to OPEN :
eth1 Scan completed :
Cell 01 - Address: 00:09:5B:D0:34:BC
ESSID:""
Mode:Master
Encryption key:off
Channel:11
Quality:33/0 Signal level:-67 dBm Noise level:-100 dBm
Cell 02 - Address: 00:09:5B:42:79:00
ESSID:"OPEN"
Mode:Master
Encryption key:off
Channel:6
Quality:26/0 Signal level:-74 dBm Noise level:-100 dBm
Now a change to SSID HIDDEN :
eth1 Scan completed :
Cell 01 - Address: 00:09:5B:D0:34:BC
ESSID:"HIDDEN"
Mode:Master
Encryption key:off
Channel:11
Quality:26/0 Signal level:-62 dBm Noise level:-88 dBm
Cell 02 - Address: 00:09:5B:42:79:00
ESSID:"OPEN"
Mode:Master
Encryption key:off
Channel:6
Quality:10/0 Signal level:-78 dBm Noise level:-88 dBm
And the iwevents :
10:49:56.454438 eth1 New Access Point/Cell address:00:09:5B:42:79:00
10:55:41.491321 eth1 Set ESSID:"OPEN"
10:55:42.777971 eth1 Custom driver event:Authenticate request to
00:09:5B:42:79:00 : ACCEPTED (00)
10:55:42.780208 eth1 Custom driver event:Associate request to
00:09:5B:42:79:00 : ACCEPTED (00)
10:55:42.781516 eth1 New Access Point/Cell address:00:09:5B:42:79:00
10:56:46.054102 eth1 Set ESSID:"HIDDEN"
10:56:47.340594 eth1 Custom driver event:Authenticate request to
00:09:5B:D0:34:BC : ACCEPTED (00)
10:56:47.344621 eth1 Custom driver event:Associate request to
00:09:5B:D0:34:BC : ACCEPTED (00)
10:56:47.345238 eth1 New Access Point/Cell address:00:09:5B:D0:34:BC
I can freely change the SSID at will with no problem.
Next step would be configure WEP on the Open.
(Although I don't think that will change anything)
(Added 28/07 - No it doesn't)
Actually, reading the Cisco docs, it seems that the secondary ssid is not
meant
for this purpose. In the examples, they use it for bridges.
Also in the examples, they show configs for this scenario that you have,
however, they
do not use the secondary ssid.
Not sure, but I think the problem is maybe that the MAC address and therefore
the BSSID
is the same. I can't see how we can influence this as the firmware determines
how to react.
The driver just processes the events.
I'll leave the bug open in case anybody has a bright idea.
Margit
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
More information about the Prism54-devel
mailing list