[Prism54-devel] [Fwd: Re: segfault on lastest development version]
André Ventura Lemos
tux@tuxslare.org
Sat, 03 Jan 2004 20:07:56 +0000
--=-uvhqUkOJJGYutj9HTDOb
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-9s3RLdWkmi2eV8Ps4f95"
--=-9s3RLdWkmi2eV8Ps4f95
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Watch out for the prism54 related things. This was an e-mail I got from
the kismet developer (dragorn@kismetwireless.net).
--=20
I/O, I/O,
It's off to disk I go,
A bit or byte to read or write,
I/O, I/O, I/O...
--=-9s3RLdWkmi2eV8Ps4f95
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Description: Forwarded message - Re: segfault on lastest
development version
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: <dragorn@kismetwireless.net>
Delivered-To: esgrovas@tuxslare.org
Received: (qmail 8238 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2004 19:26:32 +0000
Delivered-To: tux@tuxslare.org
Received: (qmail 8233 invoked by uid 204); 3 Jan 2004 19:26:32 +0000
Received: from dragorn@kismetwireless.net by tuxslare.org by uid 201 with
qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.60. spamassassin: 2.60.
Clear:SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 2.554065 secs); 03 Jan 2004 19:26:32
-0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
Received: from melchior.nerv-un.net (HELO nerv-un.net) (216.179.91.90) by 0
with SMTP; 3 Jan 2004 19:26:29 +0000
Received: from localhost (melchior.nerv-un.net [216.179.91.90]) by
nerv-un.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA6C10BA1D for <tux@tuxslare.org>;
Sat, 3 Jan 2004 14:18:24 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 14:26:17 -0500
From: Mike Kershaw <dragorn@kismetwireless.net>
To: Andr? Ventura Lemos <tux@tuxslare.org>
Subject: Re: segfault on lastest development version
Message-ID: <20040103192617.GB9649@automatic.lan>
References: <1073155353.12012.14.camel@lapy.tuxslare.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1073155353.12012.14.camel@lapy.tuxslare.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5i
--vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> I don't have that directory, I have AC instead of ACAD.
Odd.
>=20
> Having changed the source and recompiled it all works now.
fclose where it shouldn't be, fixed the segfault
> btw: I have ACPI and I get 596523h14m8s of battery time (it's with 45%).
AC isn't the same as ACAD so if you're pointing to that it's probably
confusing the logic entirely.
> btw2: I have a prismGT, and I always get that the channel is 0 and my
> "Wireless Card Power" is also 0. Are this known issues?
The prism54 drivers are a little funny. I don't have a card to do more
testing or development with though, so theres not much I can do right
now about that. If I can afford one in a paycheck or two I'll take a
look at them.
prism54 is a subtype of the 11g/wext sources, so a channel of 0 means
the drivers aren't returning the current channel via wireless
extentions. I don't know what linktype they report - if it's pure
802.11 theres no per-packet signal levels for kismet to extract. If
they're returning prism headers, they're not filling in the signal
levels correctly.
-m
--=20
"We're sorry, Susy won't be attending classes for the rest of this academic=
=20
year. She caught the measles, and we had her shot."
--vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/9xdY17KIInOLvbERAsXZAJwNsMiOiswIvePODXHaQNt6kp3zSgCdFdKe
qBQUF7gxpPFf8JxZPMnDYrA=
=roIn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko--
--=-9s3RLdWkmi2eV8Ps4f95--
--=-uvhqUkOJJGYutj9HTDOb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA/9yEcduWuN7ka4fkRAp3fAJ9QwefcV2gPc7SXAqzgaYdaiLwJCwCgj6rE
tmk9ivyrMw/XGJpFxURRL1k=
=d57V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-uvhqUkOJJGYutj9HTDOb--